Jafari Law Group | California Employment Litigation & Patent Lawyers
Intellectual Property Law Firm
Curated by the top Orange County patent attorneys of Jafari Law Group.
[su_box title=”DOWNLOAD PDF – Patent No.: US 9,439,457 B2″]Click here to download the PDF document for this patent. [/su_box] ARCH-SUPPORTING SOCK TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0001] The present invention relates in general to an arch-supporting sock, and more specifically, to a sock which provides additional support and stability to the arch of the …
Continue reading “ARCH-SUPPORTING SOCK – Patent No.: US 9,439,457 B2”
[su_box title=”DOWNLOAD PDF – Patent No.: US 9,402,453 B2″]Click here to download the PDF document for this patent. [/su_box] MOBILE DEVICE TRANSMISSION APPARATUS WITH INTEGRATED TOOL PRIORITY NOTICE [0001] The present application is a continuation of Application No. 14/482,683, filed September 10, 2014, which claims Priority from Provisional Application 61/913,841 filed on December 9, 2013, …
[su_box title=”DOWNLOAD PDF – Patent No.: US 9,317,985 B2″]Click here to download the PDF document for this patent. [/su_box] PRIORITY NOTICE [0001] The present application is a continuation of Application No. 14/729,533, filed June 3, 2015, which is a continuation of Application No. 14/621,233, filed February 12, 2015, which claims Priority from Provisional Application 62/084,471, …
[su_box title=”DOWNLOAD PDF – Patent No.: US 9,247,916 B2″]Click here to download the PDF document for this patent. [/su_box] PRIORITY NOTICE [0001] This present application is a continuation-in-part of, and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 to, U.S. Non-provisional Patent Application 14/151734, filed on January 9, 2014, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein …
In this POS patent infringement lawsuit, CardSoft sued VeriFone and others asserting infringement of its software patents. Both companies are in the point of sale (POS) industry that consumers recognize as credit card readers, and also the industry that Apple is seeking to gain market share in with its new concept of Apple Pay. At …
Continue reading “"Write Once, Run Anywhere" – POS Patent Infringement Lawsuit Reversed on Appeal”
On September 26, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court’s findings that several patents asserted against Honda, were invalid as a result of inequitable conduct during prosecution. According to the Court’s findings, an eager inventor acted with intent to deceive the United States Patent and Trademark Office …
This past summer the Supreme Court ruled against Aereo, Inc. in the case of American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.[1] The decision hinged on the meaning behind two critical terms of the Copyright Act (17 U.S.C.): “perform” and “publicly”. The Court first had to decide whether the actions by Aereo constitute a performance as …
Continue reading “Public performance under the Copyright Act”
The American system is unlike many others when it comes to paying the attorney’s fees of the winner in litigation. Patent cases have always been a little different in that the relevant statutes allowed for the district court judge to consider a fee motion in favor of the winner in a patent infringement suit. Until …
Continue reading “Message to Patent Trolls: Lose & You Will Pay Attorney’s Fees”